חילוף חומרים מהיר

-DMD- · 25-04-10, 20:10

קראתי המון בנושא, אם אתה מנסה לצאת גדול... לא יצא לך
אל תנסה לברוח ותנסה להוכיח את מה שאמרת.
אני קראתי הרבה מאמרים ב bodybuilding . com
תקן אותי ותן לי מאמר שמחזק אותך.

!Demon! · 25-04-10, 20:30

תגובה של לייל מקדונלד בנושא של כמות הארוחות שדיברת עליו:
"Perhaps one of the longest standing dogmas in the weight loss and bodybuilding world is the absolute necessity of eating frequently for various reasons. Specific to weight loss, how many times have you heard something along the lines of “Eating 6 times per day stokes the metabolic fire.” or “You must eat 6 times per day to lose fat effectively.” or “Skipping even one meal per day will slow your metabolic rate and you’ll hoard fat.” Probably a lot

Well, guess what. The idea is primarily based on awful observational studies and direct research (where meal frequency is varied within the context of an identical number of calories under controlled conditions) says that it’s all basically nonsense. The basic premise came, essentially out of a misunderstanding of the thermic effect of food (TEF) also called dietary induced thermogenesis (DIT) which are the calories burned in processing of the food you eat."

"Aha! Eat more frequently and metabolic rate goes up more, right? Because you’re stimulating TEF more often. Well, no. Here’s why:

Say we have two people, both eating the same 3000 calories per day from identical macronutrients. One eats 6 meals of 500 calories/meal while the other eats 3 meals of 1000 calories/meal and we’ll assume a TEF of 10%. So the first will have a TEF of 50 calories (10% of 500) 6 times/day. The second will have a TEF of 100 calories (10% of 1000 calories) 3 times/day. Well, 6X50 = 300 calories/day and 3X100 = 300 calories/day. There’s no difference.

Of course, if you increase food intake from, say, 1500 calories to 2000 calories, you will burn more with TEF; but this has nothing to do with meal frequency per se, it has to do with eating more food. I only bring this up because I’ve seen people (try to) argue the positive effect of TEF by dredging up studies where folks ate more total calories. Of course TEF goes up, but not because they are eating more frequently; rather it’s because they are eating more food in total."
http://www.bodyrecomposition.com/res...ch-review.html

אף אחד לא מנסה להוכיח שהוא גבר פה או משהו כזה פשוט יש לך דברים שגוים ,תלמד לקבל את זה ..כל אחד מאיתנו מתישהו לא ידע הרבה ...

אשכולות דומים
אשכול	מפרסם האשכול	פורום	תגובות	הודעה אחרונה
חילוף חומרים מהיר	IsraMaster	תזונה ותוספים	4	26-02-10 22:28
חילוף חומרים מהיר	DanielP	תזונה ותוספים	3	24-09-09 15:09
חילוף חומרים מהיר מידי-בעייה	YONI	תזונה ותוספים	19	01-02-09 15:36
חילוף חומרים מהיר	gil-da91	תזונה ותוספים	8	28-09-08 15:41
חילוף חומרים מהיר, למה זה טוב?	toxicity	תזונה ותוספים	16	24-09-07 13:22

25-04-10, 20:10	#1
-DMD- חבר פעיל תאריך הצטרפות: Apr 2010 צפה באלבומי התמונות של -DMD- הודעות: 56 גיל:: 20	קראתי המון בנושא, אם אתה מנסה לצאת גדול... לא יצא לך אל תנסה לברוח ותנסה להוכיח את מה שאמרת. אני קראתי הרבה מאמרים ב bodybuilding . com תקן אותי ותן לי מאמר שמחזק אותך.

25-04-10, 20:30	#2
!Demon! חבר פעיל תאריך הצטרפות: Aug 2007 צפה באלבומי התמונות של !Demon! הודעות: 4,563 כללי:: 179\95 גיל:: 21 עוסק ב:: עובד כמו פיליפיני חדר כושר: Pride	תגובה של לייל מקדונלד בנושא של כמות הארוחות שדיברת עליו: "Perhaps one of the longest standing dogmas in the weight loss and bodybuilding world is the absolute necessity of eating frequently for various reasons. Specific to weight loss, how many times have you heard something along the lines of “Eating 6 times per day stokes the metabolic fire.” or “You must eat 6 times per day to lose fat effectively.” or “Skipping even one meal per day will slow your metabolic rate and you’ll hoard fat.” Probably a lot Well, guess what. The idea is primarily based on awful observational studies and direct research (where meal frequency is varied within the context of an identical number of calories under controlled conditions) says that it’s all basically nonsense. The basic premise came, essentially out of a misunderstanding of the thermic effect of food (TEF) also called dietary induced thermogenesis (DIT) which are the calories burned in processing of the food you eat." "Aha! Eat more frequently and metabolic rate goes up more, right? Because you’re stimulating TEF more often. Well, no. Here’s why: Say we have two people, both eating the same 3000 calories per day from identical macronutrients. One eats 6 meals of 500 calories/meal while the other eats 3 meals of 1000 calories/meal and we’ll assume a TEF of 10%. So the first will have a TEF of 50 calories (10% of 500) 6 times/day. The second will have a TEF of 100 calories (10% of 1000 calories) 3 times/day. Well, 6X50 = 300 calories/day and 3X100 = 300 calories/day. There’s no difference. Of course, if you increase food intake from, say, 1500 calories to 2000 calories, you will burn more with TEF; but this has nothing to do with meal frequency per se, it has to do with eating more food. I only bring this up because I’ve seen people (try to) argue the positive effect of TEF by dredging up studies where folks ate more total calories. Of course TEF goes up, but not because they are eating more frequently; rather it’s because they are eating more food in total." http://www.bodyrecomposition.com/res...ch-review.html אף אחד לא מנסה להוכיח שהוא גבר פה או משהו כזה פשוט יש לך דברים שגוים ,תלמד לקבל את זה ..כל אחד מאיתנו מתישהו לא ידע הרבה ...